Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

If  how to protect yourself from 5g radiation 've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

However, because  how to protect your body from 5g  transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to various potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.

While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.

However,  how to protect yourself from 5g towers  found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.


This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.