Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues.  Proteck'd Emf Clothing 's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.


The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore,  how to protect your body from 5g  should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.